Eisenmann, Jacobs win 19th appeal
The Seventh Circuit has ordered a resentencing for the firm’s client because he was entitled to benefit from a recently enacted, retroactive change to the Guidelines.
read moreThe Seventh Circuit has ordered a resentencing for the firm’s client because he was entitled to benefit from a recently enacted, retroactive change to the Guidelines.
read moreThe Seventh Circuit has ordered a resentencing for the firm’s client because his advisory Guidelines range was not supported by sufficient findings. The firm now has 18 criminal-defense victories in that court.
read moreThe Seventh Circuit has ordered a resentencing for the firm’s client because the client was sentenced by a judge with an appearance of bias in favor of the government. The firm now has 17 criminal-defense victories in that court.
read moreThe Seventh Circuit has vacated a guilty plea for the firm’s client due to a legal error regarding the mandatory-minimum sentence under 21 U.S.C. 841, 851. The firm now has 16 criminal-defense victories in that court.
read moreThe Seventh Circuit has ordered a resentencing for the firm’s client because the client was sentenced under an incorrect advisory Guidelines range. The firm now has 15 criminal-defense victories in that court.
read moreThe Seventh Circuit has reversed a conviction and ordered a resentencing for the firm’s client because the statute of conviction was unconstitutionally vague. The firm now has 14 criminal-defense victories on appeal.
read more